Findings
Looking at the graph it becomes immediately evident that the main clusters are those related to Freedom of information (dark purple), Internet censorship (blue) and Digital rights (red).
Little, but of no less imprtance, is the cluster related to the Streisand effect (pink), connected to the Freedom of information cluster.
On the upper right of the visualization there’s an other major cluster, containing two relevant topics (Data and information privacy, in light purple, and Privacy and Mass surveillance in orange) with the ideal center in the Internet privacy node (orange), and one topic less relevant to our research (Tor and anonimity, in dark purple) linked to the Freedom of information cluster.
On the left side are those minor cluster of less importance to our topic, such as Open source, Open society and Opennes (dark green).
In the bottom-right of the visualization there’s a cluster inherent to the legal aspects of the topic, such as International human right law or Public international law, along with the Human and Minority rights (yellow).
Two bridges, Copyleft and Pirate Party, connect the main central cluster to one of less importance and relevance to us, regarding Internet security and Intellectual property (red).
Another bridge, United Nations (red), can be found in the bottom-left of the network, connecting the Digital Rights cluster (red), to that of the Human and Minority rights (yellow).
The main authorities in this network are Internet Censorship, Freedom of Information and, in a minor way, Internet privacy, which are also the main themes in the Right to be forgotten controversy.
The most important finding of this visualization is that the majority of the most relevant topics of discussion of this controversy are situated in the central cluster: Internet censorship, Freedom of information and Digital rights, having the ideal center of the whole graph in the Internet censorship node, which is also the main objection to the right to be forgotten discussion.